Skip to content
Search
Log In
Search
Knowledge Base
Explore Resources
Materials Directory
Literacy Listens Podcast
Additional Practices
FAQs
About
Support
Knowledge Base
Explore Resources
Materials Directory
Literacy Listens Podcast
Additional Practices
FAQs
About
Support
Home
•
Resource Directory
•
Distinguishing Details
Activity
Distinguishing Details
Cost
Free
Skills
Comprehension Monitoring
Reasoning
Text Structure
Grades
4-5
Standards
L.3
,
Language
,
NC ELA Anchor Standards
,
Reading for Information
,
Reading for Literature
,
RI.1
,
RI.10
,
RI.2
,
RI.3
,
RI.5
,
RI.6
,
RI.7
,
RI.8
,
RI.9
,
RL.1
,
RL.10
,
RL.2
,
RL.3
,
RL.5
,
RL.6
,
RL.9
,
SL.1
,
SL.2
,
SL.4
,
Speaking and Listening
What is it?
In this activity students will listen to an expository text and identify key details
View the Resource
Est. Delivery Time
30 min
Training
No
Modifications
A
,
A & B
,
B
Instructional Setting(s)
Individual
,
Small Group
Ease of Use
Easy
Tier
Tier 1
Return to the Resource Directory
Something not working?
Click here to report a broken resource.
Similar Listening Comprehension Resources
Activity
Sequins Trains
Grammar + Syntax
Vocabulary
Sequins Trains
Students practice using complex sentences by creating stories from pictures.
Grade Level(s)
PK
Cost
Free
Activity
More Incredible Inferences
Inference
Reasoning
More Incredible Inferences
During this activity students will listen to an Inference and take turns looking for the phrase on their gameboard that answers the Inference question.
Grade Level(s)
4-5
Cost
Free
Platform
Epic!
Grammar + Syntax
Inference
Perspective Taking
Epic!
Epic! Is a platform that provides students with access to over 40,000 digital texts (books, audiobooks, and videos).
Grade Level(s)
2-3
,
4-5
,
K-1
Cost
Free
No resources found
Back to the Resource Directory
Report a broken resource link
Name
Email Address
Broken Resource
Submit
This resource requires the following modifications to explicitly target listening comprehension:
shift the burden of decoding/encoding onto the educator (i.e., the educator should read/write instead of the student(s)).
shift the avenue of critical thinking from writing to discussion (i.e., instead of students writing they should discuss).