Skip to content
Log In
Sign Up
Knowledge Base
Learning Modules
Additional Practices
Materials Directory
Literacy Listens Podcast
About
About
FAQs
Support
Knowledge Base
Learning Modules
Additional Practices
Materials Directory
Literacy Listens Podcast
About
About
FAQs
Support
Home
•
Resource Directory
•
Makie-and-Check-A- Prediction
Activity
Makie-and-Check-A- Prediction
Cost
Free
Skills
Comprehension Monitoring
Grades
K-1
Standards
NC ELA Anchor Standards
,
Reading for Literature
,
RI.10
,
RL.10
,
RL.2
,
RL.5
,
SL.4
What is it?
In this activity, students make predictions before listening to a text and record what they found after listening to a text. This activity can be modified so students are only engaging with oral text and respond to prompts through discussion.
View the Resource
Est. Delivery Time
30 min
Training
Yes
Modifications
A
,
A & B
,
B
Instructional Setting(s)
Individual
,
Small Group
Ease of Use
Easy
Tier
Tier 1
Return to the Resource Directory
Something not working?
Click here to report a broken resource.
Similar Listening Comprehension Resources
Activity
Antonym Match-Up
Grammar + Syntax
Vocabulary
Antonym Match-Up
In this actvity students will identify matching antonyms (eg., hot/cold).
Grade Level(s)
K-1
Cost
Free
Activity
Detail Delight
Reasoning
Text Structure
Detail Delight
In this activity students listen to an expository text and identify key details
Grade Level(s)
4-5
Cost
Free
Assessment
Ekwall/Shanker Reading Inventory Fifth Edition
Comprehension Monitoring
Grammar + Syntax
Inference
Perspective Taking
Vocabulary
Ekwall/Shanker Reading Inventory Fifth Edition
The Ekwall/Shanker Reading Inventory (Fifth Edition) measures students’ reading and language skills across 12 subtests.
Grade Level(s)
N/A
Cost
Free
No resources found
Back to the Resource Directory
Report a broken resource link
Name
Email Address
Broken Resource
Submit
This resource requires the following modifications to explicitly target listening comprehension:
shift the burden of decoding/encoding onto the educator (i.e., the educator should read/write instead of the student(s)).
shift the avenue of critical thinking from writing to discussion (i.e., instead of students writing they should discuss).