Skip to content
Log In
Sign Up
Knowledge Base
Learning Modules
Additional Practices
Materials Directory
Literacy Listens Podcast
About
About
FAQs
Support
Knowledge Base
Learning Modules
Additional Practices
Materials Directory
Literacy Listens Podcast
About
About
FAQs
Support
Home
•
Resource Directory
•
Fiction and Nonfiction Sort
Activity
Fiction and Nonfiction Sort
Cost
Free
Skills
Text Structure
Grades
K-1
Standards
L.3
,
Language
,
NC ELA Anchor Standards
,
Reading for Information
,
Reading for Literature
,
RI.1
,
RI.10
,
RI.3
,
RI.5
,
RI.6
,
RI.9
,
RL.1
,
RL.10
,
RL.3
,
RL.5
,
RL.6
,
RL.9
,
SL.4
What is it?
Students determine whether a text is fiction or non fiction by reviewing text features.
View the Resource
Est. Delivery Time
25 min
Training
No
Modifications
A
,
A & B
,
B
Instructional Setting(s)
Individual
,
Small Group
Ease of Use
Easy
Tier
Tier 1
Return to the Resource Directory
Something not working?
Click here to report a broken resource.
Similar Listening Comprehension Resources
Routine
Does it Make Sense?
Comprehension Monitoring
Does it Make Sense?
This resource is a quick and simple activity designed to facilitate the development of listening comprehension monitoring through the use of short stories.
Grade Level(s)
2-3
,
4-5
,
K-1
Cost
Free
Activity
Makie-and-Check-A- Prediction
Comprehension Monitoring
Makie-and-Check-A- Prediction
In this activity, students make predictions before listening to a text and record what they found after listening to a text.
Grade Level(s)
K-1
Cost
Free
Activity
Fiction and Nonfiction Find
Text Structure
Fiction and Nonfiction Find
Students will listen to several texts and sort them based on their genre.
Grade Level(s)
4-5
Cost
Free
No resources found
Back to the Resource Directory
Report a broken resource link
Name
Email Address
Broken Resource
Submit
This resource requires the following modifications to explicitly target listening comprehension:
shift the burden of decoding/encoding onto the educator (i.e., the educator should read/write instead of the student(s)).
shift the avenue of critical thinking from writing to discussion (i.e., instead of students writing they should discuss).